Okay, so Sarah Silverman isn't a glitch in real life, although I could draw some parallels if asked. However, the character she played in the animated movie Wreck-it Ralph, was a glitch - a video game glitch. And Sarah was hilarious - just like real life. In the old days of the 60s, a glitch would equate to being a "tilt" on a pinball machine. As a pinball fanatic, whenever I tilted, I wasn't quite sure if I caused it, or the machine did - frustrating. And all glitches are very frustrating.
Take software for example. Specifically, take Microsoft Word. First, I've loved it and used it since the early Windows systems, notably Windows 95. its improved a lot since and added some great conveniences. It also takes 40 GB on my machine, but hey, there's a lot to it! (A lot I can't figure out -- because its all "intuitive" -- another word for obfuscatory AND frustrating.)
I'm trying to be a writer, so I write every morning for a few hours. Besides the GUI interface itself, the ability to move and use the cursor effectively for almost anything, my favorite Word feature is Cut and Paste. That has to be one of the greatest computer related inventions of all time. Especially since it isn't hampered by size or content (pictures for example). Someday I'll do a whole post just on Cut and Paste, but for now, it shouldn't be taken for granted, yet it should be expected in every application, and is especially useful on Internet sites.
Getting back to glitches: one, I have a sneaky feeling that Word doesn't always Save documents properly. Any number of times I have made changes to a document, saved them, and when I open what I think is the same document the next day? The changes aren't there. I've looked at my hundreds of documents and eliminated duplicate or very similar document names as the culprit, so it must be Word itself. That's not good. Its also very scary, because as a writer I get inspired to make changes, save it and forget it. I've become to trusting of Word. Ah, but now I'm not anymore. Have you ever had that Save problem?
Two: settings can be another glitch -- losing them I mean. Again, it must be a problem with the Save feature. Why my page formats would change between saving and opening the same document later, I don't know.
It could be the Autosave Feature that's responsible, saving the older version and not the new. Whatever it is its happened to me many times.
I've been using a computer at home (Commodore 64) and work (earliest IBM PC) for decades now. I love computers and all the spinoffs. (phones are a different story) Computers have come a long way in most ways, and not very far in others (take the step backward Microsoft took in Windows 7 with its extremely poor Control Panel). Currently any computer attempt at artificial intelligence is stupid. Like the Autofill Feature in Excel sometimes, or automatic paragraph indenting or numbering in Word. Failures and extremely frustrating. Even more so because I can't figure out how to turn them off!
The most frustrating thing of course, is that there's no User Manual, only incredibly limited and stupid Help. But those aren't glitches, that gets into design, and that's a different blogpost.
Join the site to leave a comment, its free.
Thursday, November 15, 2012
Friday, September 14, 2012
Voter ID Constitutional
I've been voting since I was 21, when I registered with the Mercer County NJ Board of Elections. I only registered because my wife Janet encouraged me to do so, and because it was painless. If I remember correctly, back in 1971 I had to actually go to their office in Trenton, show them my Driver's License, and sign a form. Painless.
I registered as an independent with the firm belief that I should vote for the best candidate regardless of party. I was not familiar with party platforms or the rough and tumble of political maneuverings. It was the days before there were public debates sponsored by the League of Women Voters or others, except for presidential ones which couldn't be missed with all the hype. Now, in 2012, during the Obama-Romney election cycle, not a moment goes by without a new comment, news bulletin or attack ad. So much in fact, that its very difficult to get through all the chatter, or find independent sources of information.
That's why I'm so grateful to the Internet and for email. I get my daily political news summaries from Politifact and others. I realize Politifact isn't neutral according to many critics, or that all political statements are empirical enough to even be fact-checked. But notwithstanding its detractors and faults, I get a kick out of reading their pronouncements. Especially when they present data to explain their judgement.
But I digress. My real point is that registering to vote has long been required. Once registered, my signature was added to the County Elections Book, and whenever I vote, I must sign the book and, theoretically, my signature is compared to whats on file. Notwithstanding the fact that the original signature is now over 40 years old. Believe me, after a long career in State government and signing thousands of letters and documents, my signature today is in no way similar to what it was. Nor is it uniform. There's got to be a better way.
Some form of ID at the polls seems inevitable, and in the long run, some form of national or international ID, also seems inevitable. So why all the fuss?
Its because of the timing. Six months or less before a presidential election is not the time to institute new voter controls. Its prima facie and patently unfair to require such documentation now. After the election in November? Be my guest.
I registered as an independent with the firm belief that I should vote for the best candidate regardless of party. I was not familiar with party platforms or the rough and tumble of political maneuverings. It was the days before there were public debates sponsored by the League of Women Voters or others, except for presidential ones which couldn't be missed with all the hype. Now, in 2012, during the Obama-Romney election cycle, not a moment goes by without a new comment, news bulletin or attack ad. So much in fact, that its very difficult to get through all the chatter, or find independent sources of information.
That's why I'm so grateful to the Internet and for email. I get my daily political news summaries from Politifact and others. I realize Politifact isn't neutral according to many critics, or that all political statements are empirical enough to even be fact-checked. But notwithstanding its detractors and faults, I get a kick out of reading their pronouncements. Especially when they present data to explain their judgement.
But I digress. My real point is that registering to vote has long been required. Once registered, my signature was added to the County Elections Book, and whenever I vote, I must sign the book and, theoretically, my signature is compared to whats on file. Notwithstanding the fact that the original signature is now over 40 years old. Believe me, after a long career in State government and signing thousands of letters and documents, my signature today is in no way similar to what it was. Nor is it uniform. There's got to be a better way.
Some form of ID at the polls seems inevitable, and in the long run, some form of national or international ID, also seems inevitable. So why all the fuss?
Its because of the timing. Six months or less before a presidential election is not the time to institute new voter controls. Its prima facie and patently unfair to require such documentation now. After the election in November? Be my guest.
Thursday, August 30, 2012
The fed budget Problems: Part Two
“Spending vs. GDP. [Here are some] CBO projections: by 2022,
[Federal] spending will be 23% of GDP; by 2050 = 55%; by 2070 = 90%. Totally
unsustainable. Revenues have only increased 20% historically.”
“Debt vs. GDP. Now the ratio is 67%. [By that is meant for
every dollar the Federal Government spends, $.67 cents is borrowed.] By 2050 it
will be 100%. The recently recommended debt goal is 40-60%. So if we don’t
reduce debt, we will be bankrupt, no question about it. Social Security and Medicare will turn into
“pay-as-you-go” programs [because we can’t afford to borrow to pay for them]. Bottom Line: more pain now, and more pain
later.”
“Two recent Task Forces produced recommendations. Let’s see how many we agree with: 1. They both recognize the problem as
real, and opine that Washington must act now; 2. It’s cruel to make promises that can’t be kept, [like Social
Security]; 3. We must still protect
the disadvantaged; 4. We must reform
and simplify the Tax Code, [which has over 5,000 provisions]; 5. We must have Social Security reform;
6. We must reduce healthcare costs –
it’s our biggest spending problem; 7.
We must reduce annual spending deficits to only 3% of GDP, [now they are 5%]; 8. We must adopt a progressive tax
system; 9. We must institute a
National Sales Tax (Internet etc.); 10.
We must cut Corporation Taxes from 35% to 27%; 11. We must eliminate tax deductions and credits, saving $1.1
trillion; and we must eliminate the Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT); and 12.We must institute higher gas taxes to fund transportation infrastructure
(on top of state sales taxes). Bottom line: [In all of this,]the Feds don’t
care about the states problems [at all.]”
“Congress has also convened separate Debt Reduction Task
Forces: 1. Healthcare, 2. Social Security – with no income limits on
contributions, and reductions in benefits to millionaires, 3. Debt reduction –
Freeze spending (in place now, including Defense), and enforce spending caps; become
a pay-as-you-go system. Problem: Bush II abolished the spending caps. And 4. A Biennial
Budget (every two years instead of one) – 26 states have it now, but the problem
is revenue estimating that far ahead.”
In closing, Rich stated: ‘“A lot of these things better
start happening now.” We must cut our national debt to 60% of GDP by 2024, and
below 40% by 2037. Raising taxes alone
will not solve our problems – we need cuts too. Bottom line: we need much
better controls on spending.” I agree
wholeheartedly, especially about the need for more and better controls.
Rich also showed many documents from www.cbo.gov to make his points.
That’s a lot to think about, and even more to do. But we
can’t just stop everything and pay off the debt. Think of the thousands of decisions, big and
small, that have to be made to solve this problem! Aren’t you glad you’re not a legislator or
the President? So, tell me, what tax deductions can you personally live
without? Your mortgage deduction? Or, would you also like to pay a higher gas
tax? How about higher Social Security
taxes? Guess what? We’re in store for these and much, much more in the days
ahead. I can only say that I pray to God every day that I continue to receive
my monthly state pension and social security checks. Think about the millions
of people who have neither, or very little. Or those still looking for a job.
How will we get them out of this mess?
Somehow, our representatives in Congress, must put aside
their differences and work towards consensus. Wouldn’t it be novel if they
voted their individual conscience and not by party lines? What about having more voices in government?
How about establishing “The Independent Party” who can vote to end these
deadlocks? All in favor?
The Fed Budget Problems: Part One
I really respect Richard F. Keevey. I knew him 15 years ago when he was the Budget
Director and Comptroller for the State of NJ under two Governors. I worked for
the State then as the Manager of the Contract Administration unit in the
Treasury Department. In that capacity I initiated dozens of contracts and
procurement documents worth millions of dollars that had to be approved by the
State Budget Director; in other words, by Rich. All spending had to be approved by Rich’s
office. Every check issued by the State had Rich’s name and title on it. So I
got to walk thru many documents directly to him for his signature. He was
always professional and keen-witted, and made sure all the i’s were dotted and
the t’s crossed. After leaving the state Rich went on to work in high positions
in the Federal departments of Housing and Defense, at the Policy Institute for
Princeton University, and as a Distinguished Practitioner in Public Affairs at
Rutgers. He’s experienced, smart, and savvy.
In April at the Annual AGA Spring Symposium, I got to hear
Rich present a seminar on the current Federal Budget problems. It was
fascinating and I took rapid notes. I’d like to share them with you because I
think they boil down some facts that we really don’t understand. This
information helps explain why our government is so screwed up.
Here’s Rich’s presentation, [with my additions for clarity]:
“I will speak on three areas: Terminology – first, the federal
government is a different world than the states, with different terms. Second,
the current problem. And third, recommendations to reduce growth in spending.”
“The Feds always end in deficits. Deficits have rolled into
our $13 trillion in debt. Feds borrow for everything. The Feds mix operating
and capital budgets together. NJ only borrows for capital projects [never for
operating expenses]. “
“The Federal Budget has two spending parts: mandatory,
called entitlements, and discretionary. Entitlements are 57% of the Budget,
i.e. Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security alone. Discretionary spending has
been flat at 43% of the Budget – it’s not growing, mainly because a freeze has
been on for some time. [Discretionary spending is what flows into and out of
the 21 major executive branch departments, and then some.] So that’s the
spending side. On the revenue side, the Feds have three main revenue sources:
Income Tax (45%), FICA (37%), and Corp Tax (9%). The Feds do “Current Services
Budgeting” which is the baseline. That means, looking at what the government
will spend over the next ten years based on current laws. They look at all
growth, increases and decreases. Their
terminology is: Expenditures equals Outlays equals Cash. All projects must have
budget authority for outlays.”
“The Feds have 12-13 annual Appropriation Bills. Until they
are passed in their entirety, Congress passes “Continuing Resolutions” as
stop-gap measures. Those are the 11th hour bills on things like
Homeland Security and Defense or they get shut down. [More recently it was Transportation.] The
President has no Line Item Veto like we have in NJ, [which makes it much more
difficult to trim the fat]. All the Federal numbers come from the Congressional
Budget Office, or CBO. It is the Gold Standard as far as estimates and reports,
and is very respected and objective. All reports are comparisons to national
Gross Domestic Product, or GDP, which states don’t do. [GDP is how the Feds
measure the value of goods, services and property produced in this county. Recently
it was $15.5 trillion annually.]”
“The CBO also gives alternative projections [for everything].
Even so, the NJ and local municipalities are better [because we follow GAAP,
GASB, CAFR etc., that is, recognized accounting principles], and we don’t borrow
for operating expenses. The current CBO projection is $14 trillion in debt by
2020. The Feds have been borrowing at very low interest rates, but they will be
higher in the future, and money will cost a lot more. The long term problem is
77 MILLION retiring Baby Boomers.
Now, there is a 3 to 1 ratio of workers to retirees; in the near future
it will be 2 to 1. That’s a huge problem.”
How to Change Terrible Business Practices
#1. Show, don’t just
tell.
No matter what you do, writing is
much more effective. Anonymous reviews and complaining rants don’t really
change anything, and can be easily ignored or deflected, like the Amazon
example. Be positive, yet direct. Take an extra minute, send an email to Customer
Service, and complete those customer surveys, as a start.
#2. Identify yourself.
This is a requirement on Angie’s
List, for example. Even if you are red in the face because you’re so angry,
calm down! Think about it rationally. It’s much easier to attract flies with
honey than it is with vinegar. This is especially true when taking something
back to the store and dealing with a lowly clerk, who is just trying to do
their job the best way they can. Always start there and work your way up. And
work your way up until you get satisfaction – most people stop at the first
step and don’t take it further. And, most importantly, take a moment to send
the company an email about your experience, good or bad.
#3. Hit all outlets
with your message, not just one.
If it’s particularly egregious,
don’t just email the company on their “Contact Us” link, but also write to
anyone with a website and an email address, and that includes congressmen and
senators. It’s so easy to do on the Internet, it’s comical. Again, the old
method of writing works best, but now we have a brand new tool, much easier to
use: your web browser.
#4. Tell people about
your experience.
Research has proven every time a person says a
good thing about a company, three people hear it. That’s compared to 10 people
who hear about a bad experience. The law of supply and demand, and market
forces, will have their effect, even though the progress may be too slow for
your liking. Also, telling your friends will prevent them from making the same
mistake.
#5. Contact government
and other agencies and complain.
To be honest, this really works best in fraud
cases. Same for the CFPB and other agencies at the Federal level, and, there
are lots, like the FTC, FCC, EPA, DOT etc. Yes, you can and should file a
complaint, but don’t expect an earth-shattering response. However, it does help
put the nail in the coffin of bad businesses. The more details the better. Also
write an email to Consumer Reports. Best of all, go to www.consumerworld.org and take your
pick of caring orgs.
Bottom line: the Internet is fast becoming the
best consumer protection tool there is, bar none. Use it. And use it often.
Remember Costly EDECA?
EDECA is 1999's NJ law called Electric Discount and Energy Competition Act. Let’s examine some significant EDECA Provisions.
Basically it unbundled electric and gas rates, i.e. electricity supply, and later gas supply, are separate from physical delivery over wires or thru pipes; they are now two separate charges on everyone’s bill. This allowed for retail Energy Choice in NJ, which was a huge government and private campaign when it first started in 2000.
(Note: in 1999 the average residential (RS) rate was 11.4 cents per kWh (combined); now it’s 16.57 cents combined. In other words, energy prices in NJ have increased 29% since 1999. This is slightly lower than the average Inflation Rate of 2.72% per year. However, inflation isn’t the real reason why energy costs have risen in NJ; it’s mainly because of the added costs of EDECA.
What are these added costs? Think of it in terms of 3% added to your utility bill each month.
1) EDECA required mandatory 10% electric rate reduction over 4 years (there has been cost control at least). In the first year of EDECA, there was a 5% price decrease, so everybody just loved that. After that, price decreases ended.
2) It mandated that Utilities must provide basic generation service (BGS); or basic gas supply service (BGSS); as “provider of last resort” – in other words, energy availability is guaranteed to all New Jerseyans.
3) Subject to BPU approval, electric utilities were required to either functionally separate generating assets, i.e their power plants from their supply business, or divest them - which they all did – the four NJ major utility companies no longer own generating stations, i.e. power plants, except PSEG’s nuclear plants).
4) EDECA established a Societal Benefits Charge (SBC) on your monthly bill that includes 6 charges, and 1 hidden charge. They are:
a) Social programs like COOLAdvantage and WARMAdvantage, which are rebates for things like air conditioners and heaters, for example. All these programs are administered by the NJBPU’s office of Clean Energy. Have you gotten a rebate yet?,
b) Nuclear decommissioning costs (i.e. the billions of $ to close old plants like Salem),
c) Demand Side Management (DSM) programs, which pay big commercial customers to turn down their power usage in peaking events – i.e. when blackouts might occur otherwise; also it mandated $256 million/year for past commitments and new programs –for eight years - which has actually been much more, and has been ongoing,
d) EDECA included Manufactured gas plant (MGP) remediation costs, i.e. cleaning up inactive industrial waste disposal sites. I couldn’t find out how many we have in Jersey, but it’s as high as 5,000 nationwide,
e) It provided consumer education (mostly about OCE, Energy Choice and energy conservation or efficiency),
f) It included a Universal Service Fund charge, i.e. a subsidy to low income customers, and finally, a hidden cost, the cost of running the Office of Clean Energy. All these costs are contained in everyone’s SBC charge every month.
5) EDECA established a mechanism for recovery of stranded costs (i.e. the costs to build and operate the power plants the utilities had already built). It said that stranded costs may be recovered through transition bonds (which are secured by an irrevocable obligation of ratepayers to pay off over 15 years). You dear friend, are the ratepayer. “Stranded costs” are original costs borne by the utility to build power plants, or to buy energy supplies in the new EDECA model, and provide power thru delivery lines.
6) EDECA had gas and electric supplier licensing requirements (which are very, very low, in my opinion).
7) Most importantly, EDECA had emission disclosure and portfolio standards, i.e. Generating plants and suppliers must disclose how they produce their power, whether from coal, gas, nuclear etc. and, the State legislature made minimum required Renewable Portfolio Standards that utility companies must meet each year, for example, the current RPS requires nearly 8% of total generation to be Class I or Class II Renewables, e.g. solar, biomass, wind, landfill gas etc., and
8) EDECA had distribution reliability standards, i.e. the “grid,” which you’ve heard mentioned I’m sure, is composed of high tension transmission lines (which you see many places, especially along the NJ Turnpike), with substations and equipment etc. to transfer and deliver electricity all around the state, and it must have 99.9% reliability.
All these things in fact, cost a lot of money and add to your monthly gas or electric bill. The sad part is, that in our legislature’s wisdom, all these added costs (3%), DON’t get shown on your monthly bill, including the 7% sales tax! But that will be another story coming soon.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
